Hi,
Can someone please tell me how much fork oil use in the ribbed lower leg 200mm travel Ceriani forks on my 75 Mint 400 ?? Thanks !!
Dave McCullough
I'd like to know that also. I have the frame painted and the engine at Garys for a check up, and I will be rebuilding the forks soon myself. There was a post some time ago that referred to filling the forks with oil by collapsing the forks and adding oil to a measurement below the top of the tubes for optimum results. You might try a search on fork oil level or capacity.
I found this posting by Merlin regarding a 74 250:
springs out,forks compressed,6" to 6 1/2" from top,6 1/2 softer,6 stiffer. Hope that helps. Mike
Michael R. Winter
I enjoy rebuilding and appreciating Pentons!
1974 250 HS Pentons-1980 KTM 175-400'S
Here is a chart with for oil capacities.
FORK OIL CAPACITIES
Model Type Fork Diameter Travel Total Disassembly Viscosity All 10wt. Refill
1979 MC80 250/400/420 Marzocchi 38mm 275mm 390cc 365cc 10wt
1979 MC80 125/175 Marzocchi 35mm 250mm 300cc 280cc 10wt
1979 MX6 250/400 Marzocchi 38mm 270mm 390cc 365cc 10wt
1979 MX6125/175 Marzocchi 35mm 250mm 300cc 280cc 10wt
10wt
1978 GS6 Ceriani Leading Axle 35mm 240mm 230cc 215cc 10wt
1978 MC5 Ceriani Leading Axle 35mm 265mm 270cc 250cc 10wt
1978MC5 250/400 Marzocchi 38mm 270mm 380cc 360cc 10wt
1978 MC 5 125/175 & All GS6 Marzocchi 35mm 250mm 280cc 265cc 10wt
1977 GS6 & MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 220mm 240cc 220cc 10wt
Late 1977 MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 240mm 265cc 250cc 10wt
1976 Cross Country or MC5 Ceriani Leading Axle 35mm 220mm 230cc 215cc 10wt
Marzocchi 35mm 220mm 240cc 220cc 10wt
1975 All Models Ceriani Straigh Leg 35mm 190mm 235cc 220cc 10wt
Send me an email and I can forward and excel file that has this all listed in order. When I copy and pasted, chart got jumbled up somewhat.
Rocket
Thanks Rocket !! You have mail.
Dave McC
The chart is vary valuble but it has a draw back. you can fill each leg with the correct amount of oil but if you measure you will find that the oil level may vary from one leg to the other, the reason for this is because of small differences from one leg to the other, It ususally works out to be only a few cc's of oil. this is just my opinion but oil level is more important than oil amount. The reason for this is because as the fork compresses, the amount of air in each leg is being compressed as well and it acts like an air shock, having the same oil level in each fork leg will help to level out the amount of compression resistence in each fork leg..
alot of guys make a major mistake when they use a heavier fork oil because the forks are too soft, It is better to add a few CC's of fork oil to keep them from bottoming out. doing it this way you will not lose the suppleness of a lighter fork oil, you will gain a stiffer set of forks were you need them most... at the top half of the stroke instead of all the way through it.....
by the way, adding air pressure to your forks is not good either, It is hard on seals and in order to get too much help from them, you need to add alot of pressure.It is better to go up to the next stiffer set of fork springs... and keep your forks supple in the first part of the stroke and stiff enough on the second part as to not bottom out off that next jump.... just my 2 cents worth....
Thom Green,Still crazy after all these years!
76' 250 MC5 (orginal owner)
75' GS400 (finished project bike)
72'sixday (project bike)
Rocket - you wrote:
1977 GS6 & MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 220mm 240cc 220cc 10wt
Late 1977 MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 240mm 265cc 250cc 10wt
Any idea what's different or how you tell an early '77 MC5/GS6 fork from the Late '77 MC5 Marzocchi? Looks like oil capacity is quite different. I always thought the '77 35mm Marzocchis were all the same until they went to 38mm in '78.
Thanks,
Jon McLean
Lake Grove, OR
Quotequote:Originally posted by Big Mac
Rocket - you wrote:
1977 GS6 & MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 220mm 240cc 220cc 10wt
Late 1977 MC5 Marzocchi 35mm 240mm 265cc 250cc 10wt
Any idea what's different or how you tell an early '77 MC5/GS6 fork from the Late '77 MC5 Marzocchi? Looks like oil capacity is quite different. I always thought the '77 35mm Marzocchis were all the same until they went to 38mm in '78.
Thanks,
Jon McLean
Lake Grove, OR
Jon
I don't know what the difference is between the early and late 35mm Marzokes. It looks like the early 35's had 220mm of travel and later had 240mm. I imagine you could measure your travel and then know what oil amount to put in. I got this chart somewhere quite a while ago, can't guarantee that it is 100% accurate.
Rocket