To restore or not ?
Deciding to restore or not is one of the big questions to ask yourself before you contemplate a restoration project. The decision is completely up to you, but here are a few pointers.
Most collectors will draw a distinction between preservation and restoration.
Preservation means to maintain the item in it's present condition and prevent further deterioration.
Restoration means to return the item to it's original condition, as it was when it was first manufactured.
When not to restore.
Motorcycles in genuinely original condition can be just as interesting (and often more valuable) to other collectors than those that have been restored.
If the majority of the following statements are true then leaving the bike in unrestored condition may be the best choice:
-the bike is complete
-the bike is in working order
-the paintwork is largely intact (over 50%, say) and original
-the bike is worth more in original condition
-the bike has some historical significance that means it is more interesting and/or valuable in original condition
When to restore
If any of the following are true then restoration may be a better option.
-the bike is damaged
-parts are missing
-it has previously been repainted with the wrong colors
-most of the original paint is missing and the metal is rusty
Bear in mind that any restoration work may lead to repacement of the original parts and paint with modern equivalents.
For some people this is reason enough to leave the machine in it's original condition and concentrate instead on conservation.
Many museums, as a matter of policy, choose preservation over restoration.
This is something I ran across, and copied.
Do you agree.
Bob
I agree with the article. I think sometimes one gets caught up in the idea a bike needs to be pristine to be appreciated. I think what is fun for the individual, may it be a bike like "Louk" one of Tom B's rides or just a rider.
Heck, one of the best photos I ever saw on this site is the photo of Larry's Six Day after the Reunion Ride a few years ago. Dirty and grimey, that bike was a warrior.
Rod Whitman
Omaha, Nebraska
1972 Six Day (Rider)
1972 Six Day (Project)
A third category that I would consider adding to the above is "period racer".
Take an old bike that is beyond any sane restoration and build it into a bike that would have been raced during it's time period, complete with appropriate period modifications.
Bob,
I agree. This is an good way to help someone decide how to approach any new projects. I was faced with this very decision a few years ago and actually ended up doing a bit of both restoration and peservation on the same project. The bike was my 68 Steeltanker V0144 which was in decent shape when I brought it home. I wanted to keep the bike as original as possible but yet make it operational too at the same time. The biggest hurdles I had to face in the process were the engine, the seat and a broken footpeg mount which were the worst parts of the bike. I ended up doing a total rebuild on the engine and having the seat recovered. I fabricated a new footpeg mount and welded it back on the frame. Other than that, the rest of the bike was completely diassembled, cleaned up and reassembled using the original parts. In the process of cleaning up all the original parts I also put a light coat of paint on the exhaust pipe to protect and preserve it from any farther rust. In the end the bike turned out real nice. I think I got the best of both worlds in the process by retaining it's collectable value and originality too. Thanks for the post.
Dave McCullough
Bob,
Are you prodding me along? ;) It's seems funny that I'm trying to get my arse in gear and do some of this right now. I'm contemplating the paint for the frame of the six day I bought and plan on riding. There's just too much rust to ignore. I've been looking at different paints trying to match the original and can't seem to quite close the gap. The motors I have for the bikes were rebuild by Dr. Doug and he made them look so nice [8D] it's hard to put them into a frame that doesn't shine as such. I hope to get something close so I can just play on one again.
TC is itchin' for me to join him on the battlefield at the ISDT Qualifier and ISDTRR.
Hopefully the purists won't string me up if it's not spot on.[xx(]
Robert Manucy
72 Berkshire
72 Six Day
82 Honda cr250r
04 BMW K 1200 GT
Speaking from the point of view of someone who simply admires any and all bikes, I really enjoy seeing both full restored examples, as well as originals. The full restos speak for themselves, but the original bikes are always interesting and exciting.
For example, and forgive my somewhat fuzzy memory, but I recall seeing Dave Mungenast's ISDT Triumph on display somewhere a few years back (maybe at the AMA museum), and it looked like Dave had just brought it in from the event - without even cleaning it. The effect was awesome! It was like being a part of what Dave and the bike had experienced.
I also got a great kick out of seeing Jeff Borer's trail-fresh Steel Tanker on display at the Packard Museum last year. Standing close to the bike, you could even catch a little whiff of premix. Oh yeah!!!
Also, Paul Danik spoke of very favorable comments on his "patina'd" ISDT CMF Six-Day, at that fancy-dancy car show, where he displayed the bike last year.
Now, if I could only find a bike that fits within Bob's list of "when not to restore" . . .
Swamp Fox, Dougs rebuilds look just fine all painted up inside that rusted and twisted frame with the ripped up seat and the wobbly old rims. And its alot cheaper than restoring too!!
I'd rather be out riding my preserved bikes than looking at my restored bikes. Also I can afford 3 preserved riders to only one thats truly restored.
Money and time are the 2 biggest issues in any proper restoration project. I cant elaborate enough on the importance of money to finish the job. Cash has stopped many a project in its infancy, unfortunately...
And to quote LT here, when its finished, preserved or restored, its all yours !!
Raymond
Down East Pentons
Okay since these pictures, I've taken this bike completely apart. I've done my homework, and from the tell tale evidence I can honestly say that this bike has'nt been ridden much.
Besides the Cranke rear brake stay, and Currnet shocks, it is 100% original.
I would'nt be surprised if it still has Austrian air in the tires. :D
This bike has been so much fun to work on. The project will consist of complete disassembly, cleaning, and reassembly.
I'm going to street legalize it, and ride this one around the streets of Amherst on Sept.13th and 14th. Can't wait !
In these pictures - I first got it home and given it a wipe-down, but have not really cleaned it much.
(http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g8/BobWardlow/Dscf1001.jpg)
(http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g8/BobWardlow/Dscf1004.jpg)
Bob,
What a great "Survivor" and an even greater catch! I completely agree with the when to restore, and when to only preserve. In my opinion, a bike that is to be ridden frequently or raced occasionaly usually winds up at the level that is accomplished from preservation even after a full restoration, and it sounds like you are definitely on the right track with this one. Rare bikes destined for show often deserve and require the completely detailed, and quite expensive, full restoration, but with the majority of bikes destined to be frequently ridden and enjoyed, preservation is the best way to accomplish the best of both worlds.
The bikes that I have purchased that were mostly complete, I am simply rebuilding and repainting the frames and engines, and doing some detail work. I have yet to learn the art of re-lacing a wheel, so the spokes are checked and trued, but I will for now leave that to the future owners to decide whether to take them to the next level, or just to enjoy riding them as much as I do. Mike
Michael R. Winter
I enjoy rebuilding and appreciating Pentons!
1974 250 HS Pentons-1980 KTM 175-400'S
Nice bike, even nicer price.
Have fun
Rod Whitman
Omaha, Nebraska
1972 Six Day (Rider)
1972 Six Day (Project)
Hi Rain Man. I agree with you all the way, couldn,t have said it better. After looking at the Barret-Jackson auctions over the week-end money is a big part of restoring or riding your favorite wheel. Some of them prices were way out there . Don Howard NH
Don I started a 1970 Norton "basket case" (a polite description) 2 years ago and you wouldn't believe the difference in price, bringing this bike back to road worthyness. I had a vision of nickle and chrome plate, anodizing parts, race cams and electronic gizmos to "make er rip". After studying and collecting the necessary parts, I found that it was cheaper to just go with the Lucas and Amals that the bike originally came with, thousands cheaper.
Rob, your fortunate to have a fairly lo mileage bike to start with. I have 3 of those 1974 250's, and not one of them is even close to the condition yours is in . I'd be almost embarrased to sell mine to some unsuspecting enthusiast, they need that much attention ! and those are the assembled ones in the stable...
Raymond
Down East Pentons
Hello, Here is a rule I always follow when I start a Penton project.
These old machines can be restored anytime and many times,
but they are only orignal once! ;)
Crash Carden, Go Penton!
Quotequote:Originally posted by crash carden
Hello, Here is a rule I always follow when I start a Penton project.
These old machines can be restored anytime and many times,
but they are only original once! ;)
Crash Carden, Go Penton!
That's absolutely right Chuck. Like everything in the world that is antique, vintage, or collectable - original unrestored good condition always has the greatest value. Although unrestored bad condition, and unrestored good condition are two completely different stories. So the condition of the given motorcycle, dictates the proper thing to do.
Raymond, You better believe I feel fortunate about this one. In the beginning of this vintage motorcycle craze, I'd pick up every Penton I could get my hands on, sometimes sight unseen. I remember disassembling some of those early bikes - and the pile of unuseable worthless parts was larger than the pile of good parts. That's when you make one bike out of three. (not as much fun, and not a bargain)
Robert, At times, the wife looks online at homes/real estate in Mt. Pleasant. Although it's going to be six more years before we get really serious.
I've been meaning to do my own research on matching frame paints. There's an great automotive custom paint store here that I trust will nail it. All paints can be transfered into aerosol cans.
Get 'er done ! I'll help if I can. Oklahoma or bust in Nov.
Mike, Rod, Dave, Ted: See ya'all in two weeks, right ?
Bob,
I plan to be at the AMA POG meeting as long at the weather looks good and I can get a seat on the plane. Talk to you later.
Dave McC
Dave,
Alrighty then, good to hear, looking forward to seeing you. I missed last year because of the bad winter weather. Remember this meeting about 4 yrs. ago, it was warm and sunny. Let's all hope for that again.
Bob
I was pleased to hear what you all said and I have to agree.. A couple of years ago I was trying to decide what to do with my MC5 would I restore it to its orginal condition and make it look like it did when I brought it home from the shop or or would I clean it up and but leave it as it is... I chooze the third... deal with what ever problems but leave it as it was when I last raced it back in the day. I decided that it was important to show the changes that were made to some of the race bikes back then... So I have a set of aftermarket shocks that I had on it back then as well as a hand made pipe that had been built for me back then as well... The only thing that is change from back then is the Mikuni carb that I put on it a couple of years ago.. the stock carb just wore out... and since that too could have been done back then too I left it alone...I think it is important to no only preserve how they came new but also how they were used as well.... I don't ride the bike much now and have thought a time or two of selling it but then I realize it will only be owned by the orginal owner once and that too is important so it is safely put away, Now that I think of it, hmmm it maybe time to get it out fire it up and take it for a spin....
Thom Green,Still crazy after all these years!
76' 250 MC5 (orginal owner)74'
250 hare scrambler (project bike)
72'sixday (project bike)
This thread brings up another good question too Rob. When to restore or preserve the bike and also when to just take all the good parts that are still useable off the thing, and use it on another fixable project.
If the projects been left out in the weather for any time, you can bet taking it aparts gonna "make you cry". It just kills me to see, here or use a 3lb hammer to drive a piston outta the bore :(
and the many horra stories of what cheezy way someone welded things up, to "hide the mistake" yeooww !!!
I got buckets and buckets of trashed parts our Prez suggested to "never throw out".
BTW anybody figure out how to repair the rear conical hubs yet ??[V]
Raymond
Down East Pentons
Raymond if you have a cracked hub I can weld them. Is this what you are talking about? Later Gary
Gary, crack would be putting it mildly, the 2 that I picked up with another bike are broke right from 1 bearing web to the other. I think their fubar'ed at this point :(. The winter weather probably broke them in half...
Raymond
Down East Pentons
This is an interesting subject. My Dad restores Barrett-Jackson style concourse quality Mustangs, and they talk about these same issues, restore or preserve. They also talk about "over-restoring" where the end product is actually not accurate because although its not modified it is better than original, its too good. For example, stock Mustang paint had "orange peel" it was not smooth and perfect. My Dad replicates the texture of the original orange peel, while others over restore and wet sand to a mirror smooth finish. Seems like Pentons, or any thing collectible that needs restoration would have these same issues of over restoration, but I'm not sure. Looking at the fiberglass on the unrestored Pentons I've seen, I think it would be easy to over restore one.
Also, there is the issue of bikes with a documentable race history, like Paul Danik's Blue Six Day. I think it would be destroying part of history if you restored that bike, or even Young Ted's bike. It should always stay as it is with its mods for the ISDT and its dings and scratches, its "patina". If its just some bike a regular guy used for racing, restore it, if its a bike with an important place in racing history DO NOT RESTORE IT, preserve it.
Brian
'72 Six Day (on loan from Ernie P.)
Speaking of "over-restoration", I've never kidded myself about being able to rebuild a bike to compare in any way with the kind of work I've seen turned out by guys like Rod Gorzny, Gary Roach, or Kip Kern. However, there are instances when I chose to build something into the bike which exceeds original specs or finish, in the interest of durability, reliability, or ridability.
With that being said, does anyone care to comment on the application of a high-temp coating process (such as Jet-Hot), to Penton exhaust pipes? I just want the pipe to look good, and stay looking good, with the bike seeing some running time. Or, is there a better way to go?